Objective: Analize our experience with vesicovaginal fistulas (WF) regarding etiology, diagnosis, surgical treatment and postoperative complications.
Material and method: Descriptive, retrospective study of patients hospitalized with the diagnosis of VVF between January 1987 and December 2000: 35 patients, average age 47 years. 22,8% with previous reparative surgery in other hospital.
Results: Diagnosis was made by urinary leakage through vagina and positive metilene blue bladder test. Cistoscopy was conclusive in 94,3% requiring urethrocistography the other cases. There was no association with uretero-vaginal fistulas.
They were secondary to gynecobstetric surgery (82, 1 %) and radiotherapy for cervix cancer (17, 1 %). Thirty four patients were operated. We divided the results in: a) VVF secondary to gynecobstetric surgery: 28 transvesical approach, with 4 relapses and 1 supravesical approach that didn't relapse. b)
WF secondary to radiotherapy far cervix cancer: 3 urinary diversions (2 continent neobiadders and 1 iieai conduit) and 2 supravesicai approach that reiapsed. There was no operative
mortaiity.
Conciusions: All VVF were secondary to gynecobstetric procedures. We prefer the transvesical approach with over 85% success rate. VVF secondary to radiotherapy represented a very complex condition with poor surgical results unless urinary diversion was used.
Valdevenito S, J. P. ., Cuevas T., M. A. ., Valdevenito S., R. ., Vargas O., R. ., Díaz M., P. ., & Olea C., M. . (2001). Fístulas Vesicovaginales. Revista Hospital Clínico Universidad De Chile, 12(3), pp. 197–203. https://doi.org/10.5354/2735-7996.2001.79763